tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8317659032924518627.post1205100945213639753..comments2023-10-03T07:38:34.367-04:00Comments on The Evilutionary Biologist: Way Cool PostJohn Dennehyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02522347714772131441noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8317659032924518627.post-62306950091850610652011-05-07T01:40:08.612-04:002011-05-07T01:40:08.612-04:00The difference is that they shaded #2 correctly. I...The difference is that they shaded #2 correctly. If you squint your eyes so that things blur, it is the one that you can best understand the shape of.patchworkZombiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18279408952877283952noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8317659032924518627.post-51454597041590578482007-11-29T17:40:00.000-05:002007-11-29T17:40:00.000-05:00The quote, "the artist always “frames” the science...The quote, "the artist always “frames” the science - it can’t be helped! Choice of medium, choice of angle, choice of context - all of these are choices." reads better backwards: the science (of the medium) always frames (and/or limits) the artist.<BR/><BR/>Both in the concrete sense of forcing the artist to reduce their imagination to a tangible medium, and in ("science art") providing the inspiration for the artist's ideas.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com