tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8317659032924518627.post8258418313476685294..comments2023-10-03T07:38:34.367-04:00Comments on The Evilutionary Biologist: Whither NanobacteriaJohn Dennehyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02522347714772131441noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8317659032924518627.post-47183065193371382492010-06-24T00:05:50.362-04:002010-06-24T00:05:50.362-04:00hello friends I really liked this information, a f...hello friends I really liked this information, a few days ago I read something similar on a site called <a href="http://www.woundinfection.net/" title="wound infections" rel="nofollow">wound infections</a>, I would like to receive updates on this issue, as it is very interesting, thanks!Kimberlyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07692441059460235876noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8317659032924518627.post-20594291442900588482008-02-19T14:01:00.000-05:002008-02-19T14:01:00.000-05:00John, Here is another case of confusing terminolo...John, <BR/>Here is another case of confusing terminology. "Nanobacteria" was coined by the people you mentioned and in this sense the term appears to have been discredited. If the disease causing, mineralizing nanobacteria don't exist, the term is still available for the real ones. That's a good thing because it turns out that a lot of bacteria found in the environment, perhaps the majority, are extremely tiny and can/should be called "nano." There is ample evidence for it. We posted an article on tiny bacteria some time ago. See http://schaechter.asmblog.org/schaechter/2007/04/old_small_cold.htmlsmall things consideredhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06672624268339830370noreply@blogger.com